Ambrose Barber was a flight development
engineer at Dunsfold when Hugh Mererwether was flying his Hunter
spinning programme. Ambrose had a memorable demonstration of Hugh's
focused approach to flight testing...
In 1958 the members of Hawkers' project office moved back to the site
of Sopwith's WW I factory on the Richmond Road and their attention was
beginning to turn to a vectored thrust fighter concept. To meet this
ground-breaking testing (literally at times) our select little
technical office at Dunsfold would become strengthened and known as the
Flight Development Department.
But for the time being Dunsfold had continuation testing to do on the
newest Hunters which were now enhanced with wing leading edge
extensions. I found myself allocated to the aircraft being used to
assess handling characteristics with this mod, such as stick force per
'g', onset of buffet and so on. This included exhaustive spinning
programmes, first on the single seat Hunter and then on the two-seater.
They covered
both erect and inverted spin characteristics and recovery actions which
I monitored from the safety of the instrumented telemetry cabin! Here,
in R/T contact with Bill Bedford and Hugh, it was fascinating to watch
the roll and yaw needles depart in opposite directions when the spin
was inverted.
Hugh got so intrigued with his study of inverted spinning that he
extended it to the Hawker Tomtit, an elderly open-cockpit biplane once
belonging to Neville Duke and in 1958 still kept at Dunsfold. In this
he practised inverted spins to his heart's content and eventually
demonstrated this demanding and uncomfortable manoeuvre at, I think, a
Royal Aeronautical Society garden party later that year. My initial
amusement at Hugh's masochism was given a sharp jolt one morning when
he breezed into the office saying he would much like to explore the
effect on the inverted spin of moving the Tomtit's centre of gravity.
Ideally, what he wanted was some man sized ballast strapped into the
front cockpit. Everybody looked at me, quietly creasing themselves.
"Parachutes?" I enquired guardedly. "Of course!"
For some reason, which I can't recall, the intercom system in G-AFTA
was incomplete to the extent that Hugh could talk to me but I could
only reply with sign language. It was a fascinating sortie. If you are
not in current practice on inverted spinning, and I certainly never had
been, it demands clear headed concentration under the influence of
negative 'g' to stay fully attuned to the correct and necessary
recovery actions. A mixture of pride and professional curiosity, but
mostly, I suspect, the former, induced me to give Hugh, sitting behind
me, the thumbs-up each time for yet another one!
Editor's note You can read more of Ambrose's, and others', exploits in
'Tail Ends of the Fifties' compiled by PG Campbell and published by
Cirrus Associates, from which the above was extracted.