On September 14th the well known aviation author, Tony Buttler, once
again spoke to the Association, this time on the creation and
development of Concorde.
Starting at the very beginning Tony noted that the first design for
a supersonic transport (SST) was a 1946 Miles project for a 20
passenger aircraft but the UK Concorde story really started with the
establishment in November 1956 of the Supersonic Transport Aircraft
Committee (STAC), under the chairmanship of Morien Morgan of RAE
Farnborough’s Aerodynamics Department. Morgan had worked on supersonic
flight and design for some years. The cruising speed range considered
by the STAC stretched from Mach 1.2 to Mach 2.6.
STAC funded research and proposals from several British
manufacturers which responded with a variety of projects among which
was the Bristol Type 198, really the origin Concorde. Having studied
the proposals the STAC’s strong recommendation, made in March 1959, was
that project design should start on two SST’s: non-stop London to New
York at Mach 1.8-2.0 and a shorter range aircraft for Empire and
European routes with a cruise speed of Mach 1.2.
This prompted a further round of more concrete proposals: the
Bristol 198 of September 1959 to cruise at Mach 2.2 at heights above
51,000ft and carry 136 passengers, the Handley Page HP.128 to cruise at
Mach 1.15 at 36,000ft with 125 passengers, and the Vickers variable
sweep Types 586 and 587 carrying 80 passengers at Mach 2.5 at altitude.
The Hawker Siddeley Advanced Project Group’s (HSA APG) Type 1000 was
a strong rival to Bristol’s studies for an SST. It was a 100 seat
integrated wing project designed initially to cruise at Mach 2.2,
though further studies went on to look at Mach 2.7. The HSA APG also
looked at the transonicType 1011, a Mach 1.15 aircraft with 160
passengers. But Hawker’s main proposal was the Type 1000. Indeed,
during 1960 the two main ‘contenders’ were the Bristol 198 and the HS
1000; RAE Farnborough and the Ministries undertook a detailed review of
the two designs. However, by September 1961 it was decided that the
Bristol 198 (or BAC 198 after the mergers) should continue scaled down
as the BAC 223 looking much like Concorde, with four Olympus 593
engines.
A key area was finding a ‘supersonic wing’, and the
principal research was at RAE Farnborough by aerodynamicist Dietrich
Küchemann, working closely with Johanna Weber. They had worked together
at the German aerodynamics research institute at Göttingen during the
war. They made major contributions to the advance of high speed
aerodynamics and flight, in the fields of drag, swept and delta wings
and fuselage design. In the slender delta wing the aerodynamicists
found a shape that was not only ideally suited to economic supersonic
cruise but also had a lifting capability at low speeds that far
exceeded expectations. Another advantage was the magnitude of
additional lift generated by the proximity of the ground during lift
off and at touch down. Key was the generation of a stable system of
leading edge vortices. The resulting Concorde wing was a subtle
3-dimensional shape. This field of aerodynamics was also the subject of
researched in France at ONERA (Office National d’Etudes et Recherches
Aérospatiales) and in America by NACA (the National Advisory Committee
for Aeronautics).
There was also the kinetic heating problem to be
solved. At Mach 2 the stagnation temperature increase is 175°C. Above
37,000ft in flight at Mach 2 temperatures on parts of the airframe
could reach 120°C because of the low outside air temperatures. This was
acceptable for certain aluminium alloys and required only relatively
modest development work in terms of strength properties allied with a
long service life. The UK’s High Duty Alloys undertook a major
development programme to perfect an alloy called RR.58, which was used
for most of Concorde’s airframe.
Meanwhile France had also been working on SSTs and
in 1958 Sud Ouest and Sud Aviation produced brochures, Sud‘s being
called ‘Super Caravelle’. In May 1959 the STAé (the body responsible
for coordinating all aeronautical study and research in France), ONERA
(the French aerodynamic research establishment with numerous wind
tunnels.)led by Philippe Poisson-Quinton and the manufacturers met to
discuss the interest and possibilities for pursuing an SST. The
eventual outcome was a 3-way design competition between Dassault, Nord
and Sud.
By April 1961 Sud Aviation’s Super Caravelle studies
looked similar to the Bristol 223. It used four Rolls-Royce RB.169s to
cruise at Mach 2.2 at 55,000ft carrying some 90 passengers.The Super
Caravelle was first displayed publicly as a project at the May 1961
Paris Show. Meanwhile negotiations were ongoing between Britain and
France for a joint programme, and in January 1962 the British Aircraft
Corporation and Sud Aviation proposed a joint slender wing light alloy
project designed to cruise at Mach 2.2 powered by four Bristol Siddeley
Olympus 593s.
On 29 November 1962, an agreement between the
governments of France and Britain was signed by Britain’s Minister of
Aviation, Julian Amery, and France’s Ambassador to the UK, Geoffroy de
Courcel. A work share was agreed between BAC, Sud Aviation, Bristol
Siddeley and SNECMA for the airframe and power plants with the systems
provision shared between the two nations.
The name Concord, or Concorde in French, was
confirmed shortly after the agreement had been signed, but it was not
until December 1967 that Concorde with an ‘e’ was officially adopted by
the British. The word means ‘agreement or harmony or union between
people or groups’ However, many in UK politics, the Treasury and in
industry did not think the project was viable and the British Overseas
Airways Corporation (BOAC) also had concerns. Deeply involved in the
Concorde negotiations were Sir George Edwards, managing director of BAC
and Sud chairman and MD General André Puget. The chief designers were
Archibald Russell at BAC Filton and Pierre Sartre at Sud Aviation, soon
to become part of Aerospatiale.
Tony went on describe important elements of the
design and development programme including the certification of a
slender delta without a definite stall - the zero rate of climb speed
was used. The droop nose which protected the windscreen from kinetic
heating at high speed and gave a satisfactory pilot view for landing
was devised, as was fore-and-aft fuel transfer to maintain the correct
centre of gravity to centre of pressure relationship at sub- and
supersonic speeds. The variable intake was designed to feed the Olympus
593 engines with air at the required M 0.5 in flight at M 2.2 and also,
by using spill doors, to cope with two engines on one side shutting
down together. Noise at take-off and the sonic boom in cruising flight
were unsolved problems which led to supersonic flight over land being
prohibited thus adversely affecting Concorde’s commercial success.
Several research aircraft were involved in the
programme. In the UK the BAC.221, a Fairey FD 2 rebuilt with a slender
delta wing, explored high speed handling while the slender delta HP.115
explored low speed handling. Vulcan XA903 flew with the Olympus 593 in
an under-fuselage nacelle with a representative intake. In France a
variable stability fly-by-wire Mirage IIIB was used to simulate
Concorde flight characteristics and train the test pilots. Mirage IVs
were used to simulate Concorde in civilian traffic patterns and to
allow the test pilots to experience flying a large delta for prolonged
periods close to M 2.
Construction of the two Concorde prototypes began in
April1965. The first flight of 001 (F-WTSS) by Aerospatiale Chief Test
Pilot (CTP) Andre Turcat was on 2 March 1969 at Toulouse. The first
flight of UK Concorde 002 (G-BSST) by BAC CTP Brian Trubshaw was on 9
April 1969 from Filton to Fairford, the base for the British flight
test programme.
Tony went on to cover other Concorde achievements
but to see these and a much fuller exposition of the above summary
visit the Association on-line video library. A link to the Video Libray can be obtained by emailing
;
the link shouldn't be shared with non members.