Amongst John’s papers was this transcription, in true Farley style….
I often tell people that my RAF instructor’s course was more use to
me in my professional career as a company test pilot than my ETPS
course. That might seem a strange thing to say, but because of my
particular background as an RAE apprentice, flying as a flight test
observer and so on, I was ever so well educated about the job from many
points of view, but when you come to be a company test pilot you are
very often trying to convince other pilots how good the aeroplane is as
part of selling it.
With the first US Marine Corps conversion we had no two-seater and
no simulator The pilots were two staff officers who weren’t even
current aviators. We had to get them out in the aeroplane and let them
do an evaluation; that’s more of an instructional job than a test
flying technique. The USMC officers involved were Col Tom Miller, head
of the Air Weapons Requirements Branch, and Lt Col Clarence ‘Bud’
Baker; both experienced test pilots from past tours. Of course the
Corps was already well aware of what the Harrier could offer, but with
the uprated Rolls- Royce Pegasus Mk103 engine now part of the package,
though not yet flying, its interest became serious.
I then had to decide how to tackle this, because there was no
textbook for it. I decided that I would get them to do one new
manoeuvre in each sortie, but only one.
The first sortie was going to
be just a taxi session. Having taxied around, got confident in it, got
used to the nosewheel steering, the brakes and so on, the next thing
was to line up, rush down the runway with the nozzles aft, accelerating
like they were going to do an ordinary take-off until they got to 60kt,
then check the throttle, put the brakes on and stop. They came back, we
talked about it, and then they went and did a vertical take-off on the
next sortie. That was just a simple ‘press-up’; as soon as they cleared
the ground, they came back down again. After that it was a case of
debriefing them; maybe they had let the Harrier creep forward, or
they’d raised the nose, and making them go and repeat it, whatever ‘it’
was, until they got it right.
After four or five goes they were ready for the next thing; go up,
come to the hover, hold the height for 15 or 20 seconds, and come back
down. If they got that right they went again, this time with a bit of
bank to the side of the runway. It was a very progressive thing, and it
worked fine. In this way the pilots built up to transitions, short
take-offs and landings and so on. Operating out of Dunsfold both pilots
made ten flights in the aircraft between 24 September and 3 October
1968, using Pegasus Mk101-powered Harrier GR1 XV742. A precautionary
engine change caused very little disruption to the programme and did
nothing to put the Marine Corps aviators off. They went back to the
States and they sold the aeroplane to the Americans. We didn’t; they
bought it thanks to Tom Miller and ‘Bud’ Baker…
In January the next year, the US Navy, which is
responsible for procuring Marine Corps aeroplanes, sent over a proper
NPE (Navy Preliminary Evaluation) team to look at the aircraft; several
test pilots, several flight test engineers, and the CO. I got the job
of converting the pilots. I thought about this and I decided that I
would play it by putting them in an office and just briefing them for
two days on everything that we thought was wrong with the aeroplane. I
could see when I did this that they were looking at each other,
thinking, ‘What’s he on about?’ I did not understand at the time that
the Americans had something called the ‘lying, cheating contractor’,
and they never expected to be told the truth; they always assumed that
a contractor was trying to pull a fast one.
My thinking was that these pilots would have got
some sort of pre-conceived idea of the tests that they wanted to carry
out. They would have come having done their homework. I wanted to make
sure that, in setting about trying to do what they wanted to do, they
never came across an unexpected problem, because the first thing you do
when you come across an unexpected problem is to tear up your test
cards and write a lot of new ones based on the problem you’ve
uncovered. I suppose I was just lucky in that I came up with what some
people would have thought was a very naïve approach but which turned
out to be perfect for the job. They just went through every one of
their cards without ever having to stop, because whenever they
experienced something they didn’t like, they already knew about it.
The three pilots this time were Lt Tom Casey and Maj
William Scheuren from the US Naval Air Test Center at NAS Patuxent
River, Maryland, and Capt Mike Ripley of the USMC. Harrier GR1 XV741
was at their disposal, together with the sixth development batch
aircraft XV281. All went home more than satisfied with the outcome of
their ten flights, but their favorable reports back to those in higher
authority would not in themselves guarantee procurement.
Further action was needed by us. I recognised an
opportunity that presented itself on the back of the May 1969 Daily
Mail Trans-Atlantic Air Race. The fastest time from the top of the Post
Office Tower in central London to the Empire State Building in New
York, six hours 11 minutes, was set by Boscombe Down-based Harrier test
pilot Sqn Ldr Tom Lecky-Thomson. At the end of the race there were two
Harriers in the USA; the one Tom had won the race with and a spare for
the west-to-east race which Sqn Ldr Graham Williams did. I suggested to
the company that we do a demonstration tour to support the efforts
being made to finalise the contract with the Americans, and that’s what
happened. Tom and I did demonstrations in Washington for a week and
then down at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia.
When we got to Norfolk I was asked to do a
demonstration at the airfield, but I said I wanted to do it from the
hard standing next to a wall at the naval dockyard where aircraft
carriers and destroyers were tied up. It was a strip wide enough to
take aircraft like F-4s; they would be towed from the airfield and then
craned on to the ships. I knew our host, Bob Thomas, commander of the
NPE, so he trusted me and he gave us permission to use the strip. We
were just talking about doing the demonstration when I looked out into
the bay and off-shore was a brand new-looking ship with a helicopter
platform on the back. ‘What’s that?’, I asked. ‘Oh, that’s the USS La
Salle’. I said I’d like to land on it in the demo but was told I
couldn’t, because the ship didn’t have all the support kit on it. I
said, ‘Well, I don’t need anything’.
To cut a long story short, I did one sortie out to
La Salle, then in use as an amphibious transport dock vessel, landed on
it and shut the aeroplane down. The ground crew, who had some drop
tanks and rocket pods that we’d choppered out to the ship, slapped
those on. I started up, took off again and landed back alongside the
aircraft carrier with the VIPs all on the deck watching this operation.
We were trying to put across the fact that the Harrier was totally
independent of ground facilities. That was the first time I’d landed on
a ship but a vertical landing is a vertical landing is a vertical
landing, and it’s a lot easier to do than the traditional way of going
aboard a ship with a hook at high speed and smashing on to the deck.
A year later the USMC ordered an initial dozen
AV-8As in Fiscal Year 1970. It eventually took 110, including eight
two-seat TAV-8A trainers. To reduce costs and hasten availability, all
were built by Hawker Siddeley in the UK and air-freighted across the
Atlantic, even though the British manufacturer had signed a licence
production agreement with McDonnell Douglas. This deal would come into
its own, however, when the time came to develop the second generation
Harrier.