On July 10th Mick Mansell visited Kingston again to tell us about
the
Lockheed-Martin F-35 Lightning II. Most of us remember him from the
late
1960s to the late ’80s as an avionic systems engineer at Kingston and
Dunsfold, Head of Avionics, Chief Designer Harrier I and Executive
Director Design. He was promoted out of Kingston to be HQ Director of
Projects, Director of Advanced Technology at Warton, Joint Strike
Fighter Director & Chief Engineer at McAir, St Louis, then back at
Warton as Business Development Director, HQ Future Systems &
Technology Director and finally Future Air Systems Director, retiring
at the end of 2002.
The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) project, which led to
the F-35
programme, started in the US in 1986 with the merging of the Common
Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) and the Joint Advanced Strike
Technology (JAST) projects. CALF was a Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) programme to develop a STOVL fighter for the
USMC and an F-15/F-16/A-6 replacement for the USAF. JAST was a
Department of Defense (DoD) programme to define and develop aircraft,
weapon and sensor technologies for future tactical aircraft. In 1993
the UK MoD and the US DoD signed a partnership memorandum of
understanding (MoU) and STOVL proposals were submitted by
McDonnell-Douglas, Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin and Boeing with
BAe teamed with McDonnell-Douglas and Northrop-Grumman. Between 1995
and 1999 Joint Initial and Operational Documents (JIRD and JORD) were
agreed for USAF, USN, USMC and RAF/RN aircraft.
The Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) was to be a fifth generation aircraft
incorporating advanced stealth technologies, with the STOVL version
fly-away cost of $30 - 35 million dollars. Hundreds of cost-performance
trade studies were carried out, the propulsion configuration being
particularly difficult. The baseline engine was the 24,000 lbs thrust
Pratt & Whitney F119 engine in production at that time. Supersonic
performance and agility dictated a rear engine and stealth required a
long, curved intake duct and internally carried weapons. The aircraft
empty weight was set at 24,000 lbs but it was required that it could
land with 5,000 lbs of unexpended expensive weapons which drove the
thrust required for STOVL to 40,000 lbs, making vertical thrust
augmentation necessary.
Propulsion studies covered direct lift with plenum
chamber burning like Hawker’s cancelled P.1154 of the 1960s and their
1980s P.1216 project; a remote forward nozzle augmentation system fed
with compressed air ducted from the engine; an additional forward lift
engine; and a tandem shaft driven front fan exhausting through
rotatable forward nozzles. These studies led to a vertically mounted
front fan, shaft driven from the main engine, the layout chosen by the
Lockheed-Martin consortium, which after a flight demonstration
programme with the X-35, won the JSF competition. BAe was then invited
to join Lockheed-Martin after their McDonnell-Douglas partner’s failure
in the competition. The lift system, with the front lift fan developed
by Rolls-Royce, comprised a lift fan driven via a clutch and gearbox
from the engine shaft, a three bearing swivelling rear nozzle on the
engine jet pipe, and roll reaction controls on engine outriggers
feeding high pressure air tapped from the engine compressor casing.
Pitch control was by differential thrust from the lift fan and the rear
nozzle; yaw control by swinging the rear nozzle. All this and the
engine was controlled through an integrated flight and propulsion
control system based on techniques developed in the UK by the
RAE/DERA./QinetiQ using the ‘VAAC’ two-seat Harrier.
The P&W 28,000 lb thrust F-135 engine for the
F-22 is the current baseline engine. For the STOVL F-35B in VTOL mode
the vertical thrust is distributed as follows: 18,000 lb from the rear
nozzle, 18,000 lb from the front fan and 4,000 lb from the two roll
reaction control nozzles; a total thrust of 40,000 lb.
Other important technologies in the F-35 include
advanced aerodynamics and propulsion integration, integrated radar,
electronic warfare and electronic countermeasures systems and
maintainable, multi-spectrum stealth. For the latter, vehicle shaping
is fundamental in minimising radar return spikes (from engine intakes,
leading edges, the forward fuselage and canopy) by aligning edges,
collecting the spikes and absorbing them using radar absorbent
materials (RAM - putty and ferrite) in critical areas. Engine fan radar
returns are addressed by having long, curved intake ducts to shield the
fan and cause internal reflection into RAM. High airframe build
accuracy, surface finish and lack of gaps is essential which led to
building the airframe, using improved techniques developed by BAE
Systems, from the outside skins and then adding the internal structure.
The outcome is low radar signature head-on with reduced all-round
signature providing additional survivability in manoeuvring flight.
Infrared and optical stealth are also addressed.
The vote of thanks for this engrossing talk was
given by our President, Colin Wilson.
Editor’s note - As at mid 2019 some 400 F-35s of all models have been
delivered; 283 conventional land based F-35As, 87 ASTOVL F-35Bs and 30
carrier capable F-35Cs.