Our old Kingston colleague, Lambert Dopping Hepenstal, FREng, addressed the Association on October 11th on the topic of unmanned aircraft. Chairman Chris Roberts introduced the speaker saying that after gaining a degree in electronics and electrical engineering at the University of Surrey in 1972 Lambert joined the Avionics Department at HSA Kingston working on the Hawk and Harrier GR5. In 1985, together with John Farrow and Mick Mansell, Lambert was moved to Warton where he managed the systems Development of the Tornado and Typhoon, ran the BAe Military Aircraft research programme and was involved in the development of the Joint Strike Fighter. He was appointed BAE Systems Corporate Technology Director, Engineering Director for military aviation, programme director for the ASTREA (Autonomous Systems Technology Related Evaluation and Assessment) unmanned air vehicle programme and in 2013 retired as BAE Systems Engineering Director, Systems and Strategy.
Lambert said that the UK pioneered the field of pilotless
aircraft with the Tiger Moth-derived DH Queen Bee of 1935. Some 380 of
these anti-aircraft target machines were built. In 1952 the UK and
Australia collaborated on the long serving jet propelled Jindivik
air-to-air target.
Terminology has varied. The CAA (Civil Aviation
Authority) used ‘unmanned aircraft systems’, the MoD (Ministry of
Defence) used ‘remotely piloted aircraft systems’, and the popular
press used ‘drones’. Industry didn’t like that but it was adopted by
the IATA and is now in general use.
Military drones have been around for 10 - 15 years
and now range in size from the Army’s tiny 10 x 2.5 cm Black Hornet
miniature helicopter and 6m wingspan Watchkeeper to the 20m wingspan
RAF Reaper. Military drones operate in segregated air space free of any
civil population or in war zones. Operating civil drones presents a
bigger challenge as they must operate in all air space. Originally
envisaged as unmanned aircraft the development of small inexpensive
drones, resulting from the rapid advances in battery and motor
technology and miniaturised sensors and computers, was not anticipated.
These small drones, typically weighing 4 - 5 kg, have proliferated
there being some 1 million operating the US today with 5 million
predicted for 2021. This disruptive technology has been a game changer
in aviation. In the UK they started out being used for TV and film work
but now have a large number of surveillance applications including
those by estate agents and construction companies, as well as
recreational use by the general public.
What is the attraction of drones? Removing the pilot
from the aircraft means he can’t be killed or injured in a crash,
endurance is increased as it is not limited by life support systems
caoacity, flexibility of design as there are no shape constraints due
to a pilot, and his systems do not have to be housed so, for instance,
better aerodynamics can be achieved through increased slenderness.
Drones can operate in environments which would be dangerous for a pilot
such as fire fighting, nuclear accident investigation, oil refinery
flare stack inspection, volcano and ash cloud investigation, maritime
search missions in any weather conditions, long term search thanks to
long endurance, very high altitude pseudo-satellite tasks, and crop
spraying which is a high risk occupation for the pilot. Air-to-air
refuelling of airliners by drone is being considered as this would
allow the airliner to take off at low weight thus reducing air
pollution. Parcel delivery is under study by Amazon as is aircraft
external inspection, eliminating the need for staging, by easyJet.
Agricultural crop surveys allow accurate fertiliser application. In
fact new uses are being proposed all the time.
Some degree of autonomy is needed but this brings
challenges of safety, ethics, regulation, insurance, legal
responsibility and public perception, the latter being coloured by the
‘killer drone’ phrase used by tabloid newspapers. In other fields
autonomy has been accepted. The Docklands Light Railway has been
operating driverless for 30 years, and in modern ‘tube’ trains the
driver only operates the doors. Rolls-Royce is proposing autonomous
maritime freighters and driverless cars are a Press obsession. The
speaker’s opinion was that these are “a long way off” because of the
numerous difficulties; in comparison autonomous aircraft are “a
doddle”!
Autonomous aircraft must integrate with manned
aircraft; they can’t be segregated so they must appear to ATC (Air
Traffic Control) to be like manned aircraft (transparency) so must
follow the same rules (equivalence).They must be no less safe than
manned vehicles. The public expectation is for driverless cars to be
100% safe even though driven cars are not. Ultimately the driverless
car will be safer than the driven one. The same expectation will apply
in the air; the first crash will get a huge reaction.
The basics requirements of autonomy are: to sense
the environment, to calculate around that so decisions can be made and
then actuate steering and speed control. Connection to the
infrastructure via a secure communications system is essential.
Decision making must be autonomous without the ‘pilot’ on board. There
will be propulsion and electrical issues and new sensors will be
needed. Very good guidance, navigation, collision avoidance and air
traffic management are needed.
Legislation and policy changes will be needed to
cater for safety, certification and qualifications of the ‘pilot’
supervisor on the ground. Communications radio frequencies are
allocated to users every four years by the World Radio Conference.
There is no spare space in the spectrum so frequencies will have to be
bought from existing users.
All current regulations are framed round pilots who
can see, hear, smell and feel - and he is not there; so new regulations
are needed. The UK was at the leading edge in this field when in 2001
the CAA produced document giving guidance for the regulation of
unmanned aircraft which has been adopted in principle world-wide and
the IATA (International Air Transport Association), FAA (Federal
Aviation Agency) and the ICAO (International Civil Aviation Authority)
all have working groups. The ICAO provides the international view which
is passed on to regions and in Europe this is the IATA who then pass
their view to the nations, the CAA in the UK case. This applies only to
state bodies such as the police and military and only for drones of 150
kg or less.
The IATA envisage three categories: open (low risk)
with a minimum set of operational rules enforced by the police;
specific operation (medium risk) authorised by the national aviation
authority; and certified (higher risk), comparable to manned aviation,
licensed by the national aviation authority who will approve
maintenance, operations and air traffic management.
Having covered the philosophy of drones Lambert then
described the ASTREA programme which started in 2006, before the
explosion of small drone numbers so was aimed at reasonably large
aircraft. The programme, which Lambert managed, was a £10m industry and
government funded joint industry (including BAE Systems, EADS, QinetiQ,
Rolls-Royce, Thales, Cobham) and university (including Cranfield,
Loughborough, Aberystwyth) programme. The objective was to examine the
whole unmanned autonomous operational concept and utilised synthetic
environments, simulation, rigs and a flying test bed with two safety
pilots on board which flew several missions in UK air space without any
human intervention. The aircraft used was Jetstream 31 G-BWWW,
Dunsfold’s old communications aircraft, modified to fly as an unmanned
aerial vehicle.
BAE Systems’ experience in military drones started
simply in 2000 with the Soarer hand-launched glider which was the first
flight test of autonomous controls. Then, with Cranfield, came the
Kestrel, and in the 2004 the modular jet powered Raven or Corax of 19
ft span. The HERTi in several versions based on a Polish sports glider
fitted initially with a BMW motor cycle engine but later replaced with
a Rotax light aircraft piston engine, was flown in Australia as the CAA
would not allow it to fly in the UK. The large Mantis UCAV (unmanned
combat air vehicle) twin R-R Model 250 turboprop powered aircraft,
larger than a Jetstream, also flew in Australia. The Taranis of 2012,
an Adour powered Hawk sized UCAV, has demonstrated fully autonomous
operation from taxi through take-off, flight, and landing to parking.
The Ampersand was an autonomous autogiro based on the RotorSport UK
MT-03, and the Demon of 2010 had Coanda effect controls.
Finally, looking to the future Lambert saw
“millions” of small drones doing multitudes of aerial tasks; autonomous
technology allowing single pilot airline operations saving billions
annually; light freight, postal and re-supply services; long haul
freight using airship platforms; city air taxis and flying cars. The
latter have been unsuccessful in piloted form because of the
ungainliness of carrying wings on the ground and running gear in the
air. The Airbus Pop-Up project addresses this by adopting autonomous
air and land modules which are brought together only when needed. In
the military arena Lambert predicted more combat drones including the
current Anglo-French BAES-Dassault feasibility study, heavy lift
airships, air-to-air refuelling, pseudo satellites and hypersonic
drones.
The vote of thanks for this outstanding talk was
given by Martin Pennell.