The following is based on the tribute given by Chris Roberts at Gordon’s funeral on 18th December at Guildford Crematorium…
In paying tribute to Gordon and his legacy, there would be little
that could not be summed up in one word – Hawk. The characteristics
infused into this aeroplane are those that were part of him: honesty,
quality, reliability, commitment and hard work. And above all else he
was a thoroughly nice man.
As a young man Gordon was a keen and active air cadet, with the
knack of taking advantage of what was available to youngsters. He has
since put back so much for others. His adventure started in July 1944
hitching rides in an Oxford and a Lancaster from Waterbeach. Tagging
along when something looked interesting was his way and this pretty
much covered anything that smelled of fuel, dope or oil; or made a
noise and left the ground.
In 1946 he won an SBAC (Society of British Aircraft Constructors) scholarship to de Havilland as an engineering apprentice where he absorbed the basics of aircraft design. He learnt to fly at Panshanger making his first solo, in a Tiger Moth, on 18th December 1948, exactly 64 years before the date of his funeral. Gordon was very proud of his flying achievements, and rightly so. His National Service was with the RAF, gaining his wings in Canada on the Harvard. Back in the UK he flew Meteors and Varsities.
On leaving the RAF he returned to de Havilland and worked on the
Venom and Vixen programmes at Christchurch. His only career move was to
the Folland Aircraft Company, to join the Gnat and the Folland escape
system projects. The success of the Folland ejection seat was
outstanding - they ‘did it themselves’ after Martin Baker could not
meet the Gnat specification. The first Gnat was rolled out in 1955 and
when it progressed onto the flight test phase at Boscombe Down Gordon
went with it, as he did later with the Gnat Trainer. When Folland was
merged into Hawker Siddeley in 1965 Kingston creamed off the talent
from Hamble, bringing Gordon to the famous Richmond Road factory as the
Design Engineer in charge of the Gnat.
His attention to in-service needs greatly added to the RAF’s ability
to operate this excellent trainer, despite its complexity and dense
engineering. Following one particular Gnat meeting with the MoD
(Ministry of Defence) in 1968 Gordon adjourned with four others to ‘The
Dive’ pub on Tottenham Court Road where he first expressed his ideas of
what sort of aircraft should replace the Gnat, although the RAF was
planning to use the two-seat Jaguar. Gordon wrote a draft specification
for a low-cost fast-jet trainer with a close air support capability,
and later, as Head of Preliminary Design P1182 which matured into the
Hawk, Gordon carried his concept through the critical early stages. His
enthusiasm and relationship with the MoD contributed to the success of
the difficult contract negotiation process.
As the Hawk settled down in service with the RAF and many overseas
customers Gordon’s eye fell on the United States Navy (USN). Many
voices at Kingston doubted whether Hawk could win the T-45 contract for
the new Navy trainer but Gordon’s tenacity resulted in substantial
company funding and a teaming agreement with the Douglas Aircraft
Company in California. Those ‘voices’ continued to argue that Kingston
should not be trying to sell Hawk to the Americans because the USN had
a requirement for a twin engine trainer on safety grounds and therefore
Hawk could not succeed. So Gordon also had to persuade the Navy that
they did not know their own business, a difficult and dangerous
marketing strategy. The only ‘failure’ was the chopping of 100 aircraft
out of the order; the T-45 Goshawk was so dammed good that the Navy did
not need as many aircraft as they had initially thought.
The relationship that Gordon and his team developed with the Navy
was one of absolute trust and respect. But Hawker Siddeley was
Douglas’s sub-contractor and the Navy was only allowed to talk to the
prime contractor so ‘smoke-and-mirrors’ phone calls became routine. At
about midday the phone would ring at Kingston or Dunsfold - 7am in
Washington and the Navy had started work. Sometime after 3pm the phone
would ring again - 7am in California and Douglas had started work.
Douglas had been called by the Navy and needed our help with the
answers. Gordon would tell them what he had told the Navy, but usually
‘forgot’ to mention the earlier call from America. Sometimes the phone
rang again after 6pm – the Navy telling Gordon what they had been told
by Douglas, because they realised that Gordon needed to have another
conversation with Douglas! This was why sometimes Gordon did not get
home before 9pm in the evening. Also, Gordon celebrated his 100th
crossing of the Atlantic in 1988.
The US Naval Air Systems Command and the T45 Programme Office gave
Gordon a plaque on his retirement inscribed: “A True Friend of Naval
Aviation - Fair Winds and Following Seas.” Douglas also loved and
appreciated him but it did take them a while to realise that the USA
could learn a thing or two from little Britain, the Hawk and
particularly KGH.
Things that are very successful have many fathers. Others have not
been mentioned because this is about Gordon. However, they all know who
they are and he always acknowledged their part. To quote Gordon, “Hawk
is the product of a dedicated team of experienced and enthusiastic
professionals”. He regarded himself as just part of the team. The Hawk
has generated thousands of jobs and millions of pounds of revenue for
the industry and the country. Some 988 Hawks and derivatives are on the
books, with a re-order for 20 in hand. Who in 1968 would have believed
that sales would top 1,000 and that it would still be selling over 40
years later? Well Gordon would, and the content of his Mitchell
Memorial Lecture in 1989, “Beyond 2000 with Hawk and Goshawk”, has
already come to pass and there are still over 25 years of in-service
time to go.
After retiring in 1991 Gordon became a member of the Grading
Committee of the Royal Aeronautical Society and a Professor at
Southampton University passing on his wealth of knowledge and
encouragement to the next generation of engineers.
In conclusion, tribute must be paid to the family, particularly
Thelma whom Gordon married in 1953 and their son Christopher. Behind
every successful man is a solid family and the Hodson team was truly
solid. Unwavering support through thick and thin was elevated to
another level during the last 2 ½ years of Gordon’s cruelly failing
health. Gordon will be very sadly missed in so many places but
remembered with great affection. There can be few working lives leaving
such a rich legacy.